Ruben Elsen, Frank Van de Meutter, Merlijn Jocqué, Joost Vanoverbeke, Bart Vandevoorde, Erika Van den Bergh, Gunther Van Ryckegem, Wouter Dekoninck, Maurice Hofmann, and Alexander Van Braeckel (2023)
Recent changes in the distribution and rooting elevation of Schoenoplectus club‑rushes in the Scheldt estuary and the consequences for their survival
Hydrobiologia :1-12.
Abstract We aimed to assess the distribution and
trends in abundance and rooting elevation in relation
to substrate type (soft sediment/riprap) for three Sch‑
oenoplectus club-rush species in the Zeeschelde estuary (Belgium). Surveys took place in 1995, 2003 and
2013, following dike fortifcations for the SIGMA
food control plan. Compared to 1995 club-rush tufts
are now positioned lower in the tidal frame, especially
their upper margin. Club-rush cover decreased by
50% in the last time interval. This is linked to marsh
succession after a vegetation set-back by SIGMA
works and increasing competition with Phragmites
and Salix. The lower margin of club-rushes shifted
downwards on riprap, but not on soft sediment. This
substrate-dependent rooting elevation reach likely
indicates that substrate stability can be an important factor for club-rush persistence and growth on
the lower marsh margin. This emerged only recently
probably because tufts needed time to expand after
the SIGMA works and because of the improved water quality. Currently, Schoenoplectus club-rushes on
soft sediment in the Zeeschelde sufer from the lack
of suitable areas with cyclic natural morphodynamics
that maintain pioneer habitat. To maintain club-rush
diversity we suggest to manage threatened club-rush
populations or to translocate them to newly created
restoration sites.
PDF available, Open Access, Impact Factor, RBINS Collection(s)
Species interaction · Succession ·, Plant height · Competition · Environmental change ·, Substrate type
- DOI: 10.1007/s10750-022-05104-3
Document Actions