In July 2015 a rescue excavation took place to recover the remains of a previously unknown ancient branch of the Senne river on the site of Tour & Taxis in Brussels (Belgium). Such a large-scale excavation of a river branch required the development of a specific approach, where the close collaboration of archaeologists and many natural science specialists showed to be a crucial factor. Multiple logistic and scientific challenges were met to accurately document and correlate the river and the traces of human activities during the salvation operation. In order to cope with these challenges a protocol was elaborated focussing on the realisation and geoarchaeological study of multiple sedimentary profiles across the river bed, the excavation of the archaeological features and structures related to the river management, and an extensive sampling campaign for the natural science specialists (geoarchaeologists, archaeozoölogists and archaeobotanists). This resulted in a large and varied dataset, permitting to document the evolution of the river bed and the impact of the management activities, but also to reconstruct the surrounding landscape (De Cupere et al., 2017). In the spring of 2019, the remains of the medieval harbour in the historical center of Brussels were discovered during construction works. This instigated the largest rescue excavation in Brussels where the stakes were high: documenting the evolution of the river, understanding the impact of the embankments, but also documenting the progressing urbanisation and its impact on the river in a very limited amount of time (Ghesquière et al., 2024). Armed with the experiences of the previous salvation operation, a large-scale operation was conducted, following an adapted protocol. The present contribution intends to discuss how the experiences of the two large-scale rescue operations forged our research framework for tackling comparable contexts in the future.
Located in
Library
/
RBINS Staff Publications 2025
The ubiquitous sea cucumber Holothuria (Thymiosycia) arenicola Semper, 1868, externally characterized by a double row of dark blotches of various sizes on its dorsal body wall and a cryptic behaviour, is generally assumed to have a wide tropical distribution, although it has not been reported from the Eastern tlantic. Careful morphological examination, with emphasis on the ossicle assemblage, of type and non-type H. arenicola specimens sampled in the Indian, Pacific and tlantic Ocean, its subjective synonyms and species with a similar colouration and habit, revealed that H. arenicola is often confused with other species. This paper formally separates the different species in the H. arenicola complex, one of them being a species new to science: Holothuria (Thymiosycia) kerriensis sp. nov. dditionally, we describe two other species that are often confused with H. arenicola: Holothuria (Lessonothuria) gracilis Semper, 1868 and H. (Thymiosycia) strigosa Selenka, 1867. The H. arenicola complex per se is keyed-out, with the ossicle assemblage of the musculature being recognised as an important, previously largely neglected, guide. This contribution highlights the importance of building and curating well-maintaned natural history collections to understand biodiversity through time and space.
Located in
Library
/
RBINS Staff Publications 2024
